I still remember the time when user styles were a first class feature built into all browsers. > (The end user should apply their own CSS if wanted (That web page does have Google Analytics, with the comment "yes, I know.wanna fight about it?" preceding it, but you can just disable JavaScripts to avoid it.) emphasis, fixpitch, etc HTML can specify such things too but it is not always done properly). So, while the CSS can be deleted, it still might need to consider it for some purposes, such as checking if something should be removed or formatted differently (e.g. Perhaps the way to go about such a thing is to consider mainly HTML, also considering CSS and ARIA to fix the layout (some web pages have forms that don't work correctly when CSS is disabled, but I have seen them have ARIA an implementation could use ARIA to fix up any forms that are broken by doing so). (The end user should apply their own CSS if wanted my idea of "meta-CSS" (not implemented or even properly defined yet) would allow the end user to conditionally apply CSS, so that for example it will only apply to those that don't have their own CSS (or whatever other criteria you might want) meta-CSS would also be the way for the user to configure media queries such as dark mode preference, etc.)įor some web pages, deleting the CSS can help, sometimes not.
I think that is very good (even though they say it is satire, it is good). What's most refreshing is that the design principle is readability of Web content, as determined by the user, and not by the page author or publisher. The developer is responsive to requests and bug reports. (Mozilla Fennec Fox is my first choice, still.) The browser is stable and very much usable despite this. That said, my usage is evolving from sending individual pages to EInkBrow when I want to do long-form reading, to using it at least part-time as a primary browser. you have to delete all data and start over again).
The feature-set is limited, some of the UI is a bit rough, and a few things are just plain broken (if you need to edit entries in the JS or Cookie enabled/disabled sites. That is, it favours pagination over scrolling, runs to full-screen, can easily adjust font size up or down (no more itsy-bitsy-teen-weenie-yellow-polka-dot HN fonts), bold text, and has its own reader mode as well.Įven on a standard tablet, some of these features are a huge step above and beyond the mainstream browsers. What it offers over standard browsers is that it's optimised for e-ink displays. (Available through Google Play, F-Droid and other sources. Yes, it's a standalone browser, not a mode on Firefox, Safari, Vivalti, etc. It's proof that Web design isn't the solution, Web design is the problem.įor those who are using e-ink devices, or even just standard tablets, EInkBro is another immensely useful tool. I'm a huge fan of Readability Mode and use it often.
0 kommentar(er)
