Wene, Phoenix, Attorneys for Maricopa County Intervenors Harquahala Power District, et al. Hurwitz, Warren Stapleton, Phoenix, Attorneys for the Respondent, Arizona Public Service Company. Bagatell, Phoenix, Attorneys for the Petitioner, Hohokam Irrigation and Drainage District, Pinal County, Arizona.
Decided: February 28, 2003īrown & Bain, P.A. Arizona Public Service Company, an Arizona public service corporation, Defendant/Appellant. 8., a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Intervenors/Appellees, v. 7, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and Electrical District No. The Harquahala Power District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Aguila Irrigation District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona McMullen Valley Water Conservation and Drainage District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Roosevelt Irrigation District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Electrical District No. 5, Pinal County, Arizona, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District, Pinal County, Arizona, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Intervenors/Appellees, v. 4, Pinal County, Arizona, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Electrical District No. 3, Pinal County, Arizona, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Electrical District No.
One, Pinal County, Arizona, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Electrical District No.
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, an Arizona public service corporation, Defendant/Counterclaimant/Appellant.Ĭentral Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Electrical District No. HOHOKAM IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Pinal County, Arizona, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant/Appellee, v.
0 kommentar(er)
